 |
Breakfast at the diner, a time of introspection. |
,
Why don’t I work digitally and skip the material art world altogether? A lot of people are doing this, and their work is, for the most part, exciting and intriguing.
I can’t really give you a clear answer. It’s not like I can’t, or there is no opportunity.
That medium just does not appeal to me.
It doesn’t take up any space outside of the digital world. As long as we have computers, the images are permanent, no decay, and no need to work at preservation. Things in the real world are mortal, unless they fashioned out of gold or ceramics. Those materials don’t seem to fall apart with age.
There is a certain beauty in maintaining something seen as worthwhile. The labor, the effort, the struggle - whatever name you choose, that marks the importance we place on an object.
Example, in city politics, the neighborhoods where sidewalks are maintained are affluent and near city officials. The broken sidewalks, they are in neighborhoods that feel, with justification, that the current government just doesn’t care. Yet, the houses the people live in are kept up to the best of the residents ability. The yards are kept in shape. People care about their neighborhood.
You just don’t have that relationship between art and people when you uses digital images. You can forget about them and they don’t change.
The other thing that bothers me is the potential to make infinite and indistinguishable images. We have already seen what that sort of thing does to a well designed object, like chairs. It devalues the individual chairs and soon they are just ignored because they are everywhere.